Morbidly Beautiful

Your Home for Horror

Posts

Cage commands a sinking ship in the soggy tribute to one of WWII’s most tragic true stories, “USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage”.

No time to read? Click the button below to listen to this post.

ABOUT THIS SERIES (CLICK TO EXPAND)
Kelly and Stephanie go head-to-head to debate the merits of EVERY SINGLE MOVIE in the vast repertoire of Nicolas Cage. Each week, we cover two films. For the first film, we let the random number generator pick a film from Cage’s catalog. Then, we put a pair of movies up for a vote for our weekly People’s Pick. We’ll share our overall impressions of each film and rank the Cage factor on a scale of Rat in the Cage (totally avoidable) to Cautious Cage (non-essential but maybe worth watching) to Cage Fighter (absolutely essential viewing). 

IN THIS CORNER: KELLY MINTZER

The Lowdown 

I’ve seen enough World War II movies to last me a lifetime. I worry we’ve made all the damn self-congratulatory films without actually internalizing the lesson—see: where we’re at right now. So I can’t say I entered USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage (a needlessly cumbersome title) with much enthusiasm. And I was right not to.

I’ve made perhaps too many allusions to Godzilla Minus Oneone of the best movies of the past ten to twenty years—since having seen it a couple of months ago, but I have to bring it up again. Because I thought there was no original approach to WWII left, and then, bam. Godzilla fucking rocked my world.

USS Indianapolis, etc, was several steps backward.

Don’t get me wrong; there’s a powerful movie in there. It’s just that said powerful movie isn’t given even remotely a chance to shine. Had this movie taken the perspective of “look how the fucking American military machine screwed over its own” in a much stronger, more determined way, I’d have been impressed. I’d have felt like it had something to say.

However, that stance, that the military-industrial complex sacrificed its own in the name of saving face, is only explored in a very cursory and surface way. The rest of the movie is dedicated to pretty shallow, standard survival movie nonsense.

Look, I’m shocked at how little tension a movie about soldiers trying to survive in shark-infested waters managed to be.

But it felt…cheap? Contrived? I know it’s based on a true story, and I did no research to realize how little of it was dramatized, but somehow it ended up feeling like every other survival movie, designed to elicit tears, just worse.

I want to touch on a couple of things that increased my ire toward this subpar film.

READ MORE

There are VERY few female characters in this movie, and the only truly significant one is treated not as a human but as a sort of totem to be passed between two men. I hate this trope; “take care of my girl after I die; I know you loved her and good news! She has no agency so she’ll just marry whatever willing dick will have her” so GODDAMN MUCH.

Again, there’s an interesting exploration of the notion of a war-time widow left pregnant feeling forced to marry so she’s not disgraced by a backwards culture, but that is in no way, shape, or goddamn form the case here. She’s just so happy a man wants to marry her. Fuck this movie.

Returning in some ways to Godzilla Minus One… with no shade intended at all towards the men who were doing their jobs… I’m never going to get all rah-rah about a movie that’s celebrating the delivery of the parts of the goddamn atomic bomb. I cannot celebrate Hiroshima. None of us should! So while I’m sympathetic to these soldiers, it still gives me the ick.

Despite all its flaws—and there are MANY, I still cried like a big, stupid cream puff at the end. That’s only because knowing real people suffered in unimaginable ways always hits me hard.

Please do not let my soft heart convince you that this is a good movie; it’s not.

The Cage Factor:

I know I’ve barely acknowledged Nic Cage in this, but that’s because he made so very little of an impression. He was sort of… nothing in this. He wasn’t bad, he wasn’t good; he was just sort of static. This is a rat in a cage for me. I hated it.

RAT IN THE CAGE (Cage’s talents are wasted in this dull, forgettable flick.)

AND IN THIS CORNER: STEPHANIE MALONE

The Lowdown 

On paper, USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage should have been an absolute banger. It’s based on a harrowing true story. It’s a hybrid war film/disaster-survival thriller with a massive sinking ship and a sh*tload of sharks. And it stars Nicolas Cage. Seriously, what more could you want?

What you could want more is a competently made film with a compelling plot that respects its audience and its subject matter.

Directed by Mario Van Peebles, USS Indianapolis tells the horrific real-life story of the American naval disaster that led to hundreds of sailors stranded in shark-infested waters after delivering parts for the atomic bomb in World War II. It’s a tragic, under-told piece of history—ripe for cinematic treatment.

But what could have been a powerful war drama instead becomes an epic misfire, bogged down by bargain-bin CGI, clunky writing, and a bloated runtime (over two hours) that feels like you’re drifting aimlessly at sea.

Characters speak in inspirational clichés, plot points are telegraphed with zero nuance, and dramatic beats land with all the subtlety of a torpedo. There’s a bizarre, half-baked romantic subplot and some clumsily inserted racial tension that feels more like an attempt to pad the runtime than serve the story.

The direction lacks cohesion, suspense, or urgency. The pacing is sluggish, taking far too long to establish the ensemble of characters, none of whom are given enough depth to make their eventual fates feel meaningful. This is especially egregious considering the source material—a real-life maritime tragedy with built-in drama and emotional stakes.

On the plus side, the film ends with gravitas, but that’s not enough to turn the tide of opinion. Survivors of the USS Indianapolis deserved a more thoughtful, nuanced portrayal of their unimaginable ordeal.

Want a far more compelling way to spend 90 minutes of your time? Check out this incredible podcast that dives deep into the true story that inspired the film. 

The Cage Factor

When it comes to Nicolas Cage’s wildly unpredictable filmography, USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage feels like a missed signal flare, aiming high but crashing into the sea. In a career full of soaring highs and wonderfully chaotic lows, this 2016 war drama lands firmly in the latter camp, but without the unhinged charm that makes Cage’s misfires fun to watch.

Here, he’s subdued, solemn, and marooned in a film that can’t decide if it wants to be a reverent historical epic or a Syfy Channel thriller with sharks.

Cage plays Captain Charles B. McVay III with a sense of solemn duty. He doesn’t phone it in, but there’s also a noticeable restraint. He has moments of quiet dignity, especially in the final act when dealing with McVay’s infamous court-martial. But those moments are fleeting, and it often feels like Cage is being asked to carry the film’s emotional weight entirely on his own.

And even he—Oscar-winner, meme king, eternal wildcard—can’t shoulder this shipwreck solo.

RAT IN THE CAGE (You can feel Cage trying to elevate the material, even as the movie around him is doing its best impression of a middle school history play with a green screen budget.)

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags:  you may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="">, <strong>, <em>, <h1>, <h2>, <h3>
Please note:  all comments go through moderation.
Overall Rating

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hungry for more killer content? Sign up for our FREE weekly newsletter to ensure you never miss a thing.

You'll never receive more than one email per week, and you can unsubscribe anytime.