Morbidly Beautiful

Your Home for Horror

Posts

Nicolas Cage is “Seeking Justice” in this surprisingly good action thriller that won’t waste your time, even if it doesn’t fully wow you.

No time to read? Click the button below to listen to this post.

This week’s Cage Match (as chosen by the random number generator from Cage’s entire filmography) was the infuriating Rage, one of the worst watches since we started this adventure.

For the People’s Pick, we put two other Cage films with revenge plots up for a vote: The Old Way (2023) and Seeking Justice (2011). In an extremely close vote, Seeking Justice managed to eke out a win. After Rage lived up to its title by making us see red, does the terribly titled Seeking Justice provide any retribution?

ABOUT THIS SERIES (CLICK TO EXPAND)
Kelly and Stephanie go head-to-head to debate the merits of EVERY SINGLE MOVIE in the vast repertoire of Nicolas Cage. Each week, we cover two films. For the first film, we let the random number generator pick a film from Cage’s catalog. Then, we put a pair of movies up for a vote for our weekly People’s Pick. We’ll share our overall impressions of each film and rank the Cage factor on a scale of Rat in the Cage (totally avoidable) to Cautious Cage (non-essential but maybe worth watching) to Cage Fighter (absolutely essential viewing). 

IN THIS CORNER: KELLY MINTZER

The Lowdown 

Seeking Justice

There are those who will tell you that comparison is the thief of joy, but they have never watched Seeking Justice after a Rage viewing.

I have.

I can’t tell you with any degree of certainty that Seeking Justice is a good movie. This Nic Cage experiment is rotting my brain in some unexpected ways. But damn, after Rage, I have to afford Seeking Justice one of the highest compliments I can imagine; I wanted to see how it ended.

The movie begins with a premise I always hate; Nic Cage and January Jones are happy and in love until Jones is brutally raped, and Cage makes a devil’s pact for revenge against her attackers. I HATE using a woman’s sexual assault as a man’s motivation. However, I did appreciate a certain subversion here. Cage almost immediately regrets going into cahoots with Guy Pearce and his revenge society.

I was initially apprehensive that this was going to be some sort of Charlton Heston-esque “manly-men types take justice into their own hands because the law failed them and we’re supposed to think it’s super cool” movie, but, to its credit, Seeking Justice doesn’t go that route. The vigilante group is menacing, dark, and corrupt.

The movie has a few clever ( think? I don’t know, again, maybe my standards have just sunk all the way to hell) twists up its sleeves, and I was genuinely engaged with it.

I know it was panned by critics, but I’m not sure why. I wouldn’t call it “great,” but I also—truly—don’t think it’s bad. Unfortunately, modern criticism doesn’t allow much space for movies that are just fine. Maybe you’d never want to watch them again; they’re not Academy Award material, but they’re a fun enough way to pass the evening, and you enjoy them in the moment.

Not everything has to be a masterpiece. And not everything that fails to be a masterpiece is, instead, garbage.

Seeking Justice may run a bit long; a little editing may have done it a few favors. On the other hand, Guy Pearce. That man has never phoned in a performance in his life, and this is no exception. He’s wonderful, and every second he’s on screen, I ended up wishing it was his movie—not as shade to Nic Cage; Pearce is just that wonderful.

The Cage Factor:

I suspect it’s wildly obvious that I’m giving this a Cautious Cage… I can’t pretend it’s a masterpiece, but I didn’t mind watching this at all. It’s not Nic Cage at the peak of his powers, but after watching him sleepwalk through Rage, this felt refreshing. It’s free on Prime, so there’s no risk here. 

CAUTIOUS CAGE (Give it a go or don’t, but trust that you could spend an evening in far worse ways.)

AND IN THIS CORNER: STEPHANIE MALONE

The Lowdown 

The vigilante action thriller directed by Roger Donaldson, Seeking Justice, was skewered by critics (holding a 28% critics review score on Rotten Tomatoes). The primary complaint is that it is formulaic and predictable, lacking real tension or emotional gravitas.

Cage will no doubt be the highlight for many viewers. His portrayal of a desperate man caught in a web of deceit plays to his strengths, particularly his ability to convey a sense of escalating paranoia and stress. Still, the excellent Guy Pearce more than holds his own as the manipulative and sinister leader of the vigilante group. His smooth, unsettling presence adds a layer of tension whenever he’s on screen. The dynamic between Cage and Pearce is compelling; their scenes create palpable tension, with Pearce’s menacing calmness playing well against Cage’s growing desperation.

The film maintains a brisk pace, which helps keep it engaging, especially in the first half. It introduces the main conflict quickly and dives into the action, which keeps viewers invested early on.

Given those highlights, are the criticisms of the film fair? Somewhat.

Like most action thrillers of its ilk, there aren’t many surprises, the plot beats are familiar, the characters are underdeveloped, the direction is capable but not particularly stylish, and you pretty much know what you’ll get when you sit down to watch it. With that said, sometimes that’s all you want or need in a flick.

To Kelly’s saliant point, not every film is trying to reinvent the wheel, nor does every film need to. Sometimes, it’s enough to provide a smooth ride down a familiar and comfortable road and just ensure the wheels never completely come off.

Sure, Seeking Justice isn’t going to blow your mind. It’s aggressively fine, which is far from the worst thing a film can be. It’s perfectly serviceable as an action thriller with a solid but understated performance from Nicolas Cage. It held my attention throughout, and I never felt like there was any degree of boredom or incompetency in front of or behind the camera.

It’s not a trainwreck, regardless of what its abysmal Rotten Tomatoes score suggests. Its worst crime, if you want to call it that, is that it lacks the depth and style to elevate it above the multitude of similar films in the genre. This makes it a reasonably entertaining but forgettable watch.

Still, it’s not a bad way to pass the time, especially if you love Cage.

The Cage Factor:

Cage is strong in this movie. He’s not phoning it in, he’s given decent material to work with, and he gets to showcase his frequently underused restraint and dramatic chops—free from his trademark mania but a far cry from his Oscar-worthy performances.

Having only watched it a few days ago, I can’t particularly remember any standout scenes, lines of dialogue, WTF moments, or anything that really differentiates this from a ton of other perfectly competent, middle-of-the-road action thrillers. That’s not shade; it’s more than watchable. It just means that there’s a reason this hasn’t risen to the top of Cage’s pantheon.

CAUTIOUS CAGE (It’s worth watching and won’t waste your time, but you’re not missing much if you skip it.)

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags:  you may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="">, <strong>, <em>, <h1>, <h2>, <h3>
Please note:  all comments go through moderation.
Overall Rating

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hungry for more killer content? Sign up for our FREE weekly newsletter to ensure you never miss a thing.

You'll never receive more than one email per week, and you can unsubscribe anytime.