Joe Bob Briggs Controversy: The Point We’re Missing

Editorial: Some things are up for debate and discussion. But Joe Bob wrote for problematic site, and there’s really no way around that.

According to dictionary.com, ‘cancel culture’ refers to the “popular practice of withdrawing support for public figures after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive”.

And who happens to be the newest victim of the scourge?

Poor old Joe Bob Briggs, for his misguided comments about the LGBTQ community that only a sixty-seven-year-old white man could make and get away with. While a small minority of the horror community are taking Briggs to task for what he said, a much more vocal majority, including die hard horror fans, Briggs’ proteges, and his loyal fans, are wagging their fingers.

One of the most vocal arguments happen to be that Joe Bob Briggs, or at least the Joe Bob Briggs that is presented on his Shudder show The Last Drive-In, is nothing more than a parody.

What can’t be reconciled, however, is how deep his supposed parody on Southern culture actually goes.

Let me introduce you to Taki, where Joe posts his views; off the bat, it should be noted that the website is gathering donations to fight 2020’s “rampant political correctness”.

Its publisher, Taki Theodoracopulos, is a Conservative man notorious for alleging that black people possess lower IQs than whites. Taki’s Magazine is a far-right website that publishes some very questionable viewpoints, including a piece written by Theodoracopulos himself in which he reserves sympathy for the poor German soldiers fighting against the American, British and Canadian scourge on D-Day.

This is worth mentioning because these things do not exist in a vacuum, and the argument of Joe Bob simply playing the character of an uninformed conservative falls apart when this persona he allegedly puts on for his Drive-In show leaks into his more personal thoughts for Taki’s Magazine.

Taki’s Magazine is sympathetic to white nationalism.

Briggs himself, in a piece addressing the 2017 Unite the Right rally during which a white supremacist plowed his car into a crowd of peaceful protesters [First Amendment 101 – Taki’s Magazine – Taki’s Magazine], goes so far as to offer his support to “these white pride guys in the polo shirts”, as he calls them.

“We need to start listening to these White Pride guys in the polo shirts and khaki pants. And we need to start arresting the Antifa thugs.”

In the piece itself, Briggs admonishes counter-protesters of white supremacy, arguing that yes, even white supremacists should be able to have their voices heard, even though they’re spouting hate speech; to Briggs, it is the Liberal scum that dares to silence white supremacists who are in the wrong.

How was this something that was able to be swept under the rug by a community that supposedly prides itself in inclusion?

On the piece that landed him in recent hot water, “I Knew A Guy Who Was LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ “, I truly do not even know where to begin.

It reads exactly like it was written by a confused, angry old white man who tries to reconcile his derogatory remarks towards trans and non-binary folks by concluding his op-ed with a nondescript “we’re all trying to figure out things”, while also trying to suggest that defining yourself as part of the LGBTQ label is separatist in itself.

LGBTQ people affected by them have the right to be angry, and to say as much.

Briggs should rightfully be taken to task on this, and especially questioned regarding his involvement with a magazine that tried to paint recently murdered jogger Ahmaud Arbery as the villain [The Lynching of a Black Jogger – Taki’s Magazine – Taki’s Magazine], and argues that black people are trying to perpetrate a race war against whites.  [Racial Revenge? – Taki’s Magazine – Taki’s Magazine] .

Either way you slice it, Joe Bob will come out of this a martyr, a testament to the lengths that ‘cancel culture’ will drag the mighty.

On the other hand, if he is fired by Shudder or whatever other outlets he is employed by, Briggs will find himself the recipient of a mountain of support, as he has already. A cursory search on twitter reveals thousands of his fans, defending the indefensible by stating their own queerness and how they aren’t affected by the comments, or recanting the time when Joe Bob did X great thing for X community.

To pull a quote from Gayly Dreadful’s beautifully written piece:

“The goal is always the same: protect a man that doesn’t need protecting and silencing anyone who has something to say.”

The calls for inclusion and peace in the horror community have been drowned out by the screams of Briggs’ brigade of devoted fans, who find the task of defending a man who has said the indefensible more worthwhile than assuring marginalized horror fans that they are wanted in the community.

Written by Anonymous